Precision Stone Carvings of San Miguel Ixtapan – the Mexican Tiwanaku?

HomeNews

Precision Stone Carvings of San Miguel Ixtapan – the Mexican Tiwanaku?

Over the past century, dozens of carved megalithic stone slabs of unknown origin and function have been uncovered in the southern part of the state of

Did Visayan Raiders Plunder the Coast of the Song Dynasty?
Pseudo-History or Famed Fiction? Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia
Ancient Advanced Technology: 2,400-Year-Old Yakhchals Kept Ice in the Desert

Over the past century, dozens of carved megalithic stone slabs of unknown origin and function have been uncovered in the southern part of the state of Mexico and the north of Guerrero, mostly around the small archaeological site of San Miguel Ixtapan, Tejupilco. Further excavations, beginning in 1995, have revealed the remains of extensive megalithic architecture consisting of huge blocks of basalt and andesite, many weighing several tons, showing remarkable similarities with South American artistic and architectural styles.

View of the excavated portion of the archaeological site of San Miguel Ixtapan, in the state of Mexico. (Author provided)

Andean Influence in Central Mexico’s San Miguel Ixtapan

The first mention of the existence of significant archaeological artifacts in this part of the state of Mexico dates to 1908. However, it was not until 1960 that the American archaeologists Charles R. Wicke and Maudie Bullington produced the first photographs of a number of enigmatic stone slabs from the church of San Miguel Ixtapan and the nearby Hacienda de Guadalupe.

In their article entitled “A Possible Andean Influence in Central Mexico” for the prestigious Cambridge journal American Antiquity , they wrote that “stone slabs recently discovered in the region near Tejupilco in the state of Mexico are sculptured in a simple, low-relief, bold, geometric style unlike known Mesoamerican styles but with striking parallels in the Peruvian Andes.”

According to Wicke and Bullington, the reliefs “represent an art style […] which has never been described in the literature of Mesoamerican archaeology. Furthermore, it seems impossible to associate it with any known Mesoamerican sculptural style. The isolated location of the reliefs in southwestern state of Mexico near the Guerrero border has certainly contributed to their obscurity.”

All the slabs appeared to bear the same mysterious ornamentation, consisting of an inverted T-shape over a rectangular frame with double or triple moldings, their sizes varying from about 1.26 meters (4.1 ft) long to over 1.60 meters (5.3 ft). Despite the initial interest caused by the article, however, the slabs were quickly dismissed as Colonial-era artifacts. Critics suggested that this type of precision carving in rocks as hard as andesite and basalt (6-7 hardness on the Moh scale) would have required the use of metal tools of which there is no evidence in the archaeological record.

The finest and best preserved of the four carved andesite stone slabs that can be found in the center of San Miguel Ixtapan. Notice the remarkable flatness and regularity of the stone surface and the accuracy of the geometric cut, with straight edges and clear-cut right angles. (Author provided)

The finest and best preserved of the four carved andesite stone slabs that can be found in the center of San Miguel Ixtapan. Notice the remarkable flatness and regularity of the stone surface and the accuracy of the geometric cut, with straight edges and clear-cut right angles. (Author provided)

The remarkable precision of the cut of one of the andesite stone slabs from San Miguel Ixtapan, showing perfectly flat surfaces, straight lines and right angles. (Author provided)

The remarkable precision of the cut of one of the andesite stone slabs from San Miguel Ixtapan, showing perfectly flat surfaces, straight lines and right angles. (Author provided)

The First Scientific Excavations at San Miguel Ixtapan

Excavations conducted at San Miguel Ixtapan starting in 1995 revealed numerous additional archaeological structures, including a large pyramid, a Mesoamerican ball court and a monumental stairway built of huge blocks of basalt. They also uncovered a sealed chamber on one side of the main pyramid.

The chamber, known as Recinto de las Esculturas , contained two huge megalithic slabs covered in intricate geometric patterns similar to the one photographed by Wicke and Bullington in 1960, together with several idols in a peculiar crossed-arms pose. This discovery showed beyond a doubt that the slabs are indeed ancient artifacts, and not Colonial-era sculptures produced with metal tools in modern times.

The chamber and archaeological context in which the slabs were found has since been dated to the late Classic or Epi-Classic period, sometime between 700 to 900 AD. There is however evidence that the slabs may in fact be much older, and that they were only appropriated by a later culture. While the excavated portion of the site is still very limited, the evidence uncovered suggests that it was already inhabited in the pre-Classic period (ca. 1000 BC to 250 AD), and possibly much earlier, during the formative period of Mesoamerican civilization.

According to information published by the municipality of Tejupilco, the earliest evidence of human occupation in the area dates back to 12,000 BC, in the form of cave paintings at the Cueva de los Monitos site in the Sierra de Nanchititla. In the early 2010s, workers digging to install a lightning rod on top of a still unexcavated pyramid basement uncovered an intact burial which has since been dated to 2000 BC. This is nearly 2,000 years before the beginning of the site’s recorded history. Next to the burial was also found a necklace and jadeite stone mask of exceptional artistic workmanship, which are now exhibited in the San Miguel Ixtapan site museum.

The civilization that produced the artifacts is entirely unknown. Nevertheless, this region was certainly important in ancient times for the production of salt, a tradition that continues to this day in the many salt mines and evaporation ponds that are found along the steep basaltic cliffs flanking the course of the Rio Aquiagua.

A set of enigmatic stone idols with crossed arms, part of a larger offering found in the “Recinto de las Esculturas” (Enclosures of the Sculptures) area of the site, dated to the Epiclassic period (650-900 AD). (Author provided)

A set of enigmatic stone idols with crossed arms, part of a larger offering found in the “Recinto de las Esculturas” (Enclosures of the Sculptures) area of the site, dated to the Epiclassic period (650-900 AD). (Author provided)

Part of an offering discovered near the summit of an unexcavated mound in San Miguel Ixtapan during electrical works. It includes a mosaic stone mask, a jade necklace, earrings and a small pendant in the shape of a human head with possibly Olmecoid features. (Author provided)

Part of an offering discovered near the summit of an unexcavated mound in San Miguel Ixtapan during electrical works. It includes a mosaic stone mask, a jade necklace, earrings and a small pendant in the shape of a human head with possibly Olmecoid features. (Author provided)

The Incredible Scale Model – The Maqueta Stone

One of the most remarkable discoveries made at the site of San Miguel Ixtapan is that of a huge scale model of what appears to be a large pre-Hispanic city or ceremonial center containing numerous pyramids, ball courts, sunken plazas and monumental stairways and platforms. The model was first uncovered in 1985, and it was its discovery that prompted the first large scale excavations at the site.

Archaeologists disagree as to the age of the model, but a consensus seems to have formed around a date in the Epi-Classic or early Post-Classic period (ca. 700 to 1200 AD). It was carved out of a huge 3 by 4 meter (10 by 13 ft) basalt boulder and is similar to other architectural stone models found at Xochicalco in the state of Morelos, Plazuelas in Guanajuato and Valle de Bravo, also in the state of Mexico.

If there is no doubt that the model represents a large pre-Columbian city of exceptional size and sophistication, the question is: What city? The excavated portions of the site of San Miguel Ixtapan do not seem to match any of the architectural features of the stone model, a fact that has led archaeologists to speculate that the model either depicted a city that is still lost, or one that was yet to be built.

It is also possible that the model had a purely ritualistic function and did not bear as such a direct relationship to any real place, being rather the imaginary or idealized representation of a sacred city or a ceremonial center. The model nevertheless appears to suggest a kind of monolithic architecture that finds its closest parallels in the rock-cut temples of Malinalco, Acatzingo de la Piedra, near Tenancingo, and Tezcotzingo, also in central Mexico.

The incredible “Maqueta” stone model of San Miguel Ixtapan, carved from a single huge boulder of basalt measuring 3 by 4 meters and believed to contain the representation of a yet unidentified city. (Author provided)

The incredible “Maqueta” stone model of San Miguel Ixtapan, carved from a single huge boulder of basalt measuring 3 by 4 meters and believed to contain the representation of a yet unidentified city. (Author provided)

High-Precision Megalithic Stonework at San Miguel Ixtapan

However, the most striking aspect of the site of San Miguel Ixtapan, and what called the attention of the early researchers and explorers of the region, is its sophisticated megalithic stonework, represented by numerous andesite and basalt stone slabs of unknown function showing elaborate geometric designs.

Over several visits conducted in the first months of 2021 by the present author accompanied by members of the ARX Project research team and archaeologist Victor Osorio Ogarrio, director of the archaeological site and museum of San Miguel Ixtapan, we were able to identify and document over a dozen of these megalithic stone slabs, only a handful of which had been already described by previous authors. During our visit we identified the following:

  • Three andesitic stone slabs with geometric carvings in the church of San Miguel Ixtapan (two in the buttresses to the north and south, one standing in front of the church past the entrance arch).
  • One undecorated basalt stone slab on one side of the plaza facing the church.
  • Two green stone slabs in the Recinto de las Esculturas of the archaeological site of San Miguel Ixtapan, partially covered over with stucco.
  • A fragment of a large basalt stone slab from Juluapan, now housed in the site museum of San Miguel Ixtapan.
  • A broken basalt stone slab at Rancho “I” – The same photographed by Wicke and Bullington in their 1960 article, when the slab was still intact and laying on the grounds of the Hacienda de Guadalupe.
  • A large intact basalt stone slab, facing upside down, at Rancho “I”, located a short distance from the one above already reported by Wicke and Bullington. 
  • A basalt stone slab standing partially buried near a looted mound at the Hacienda de Guadalupe, photographed by Wicke and Bullington in 1959 and now lost.
  • Two undecorated andesitic stone slabs and the fragment of another andesitic slab with T-shaped geometric decoration on the Cerro de la Guitarra, excavated by treasure hunters from a nearby mound.
  • A basalt stone slab with geometric carvings from the site of Pinzán Morado (Los Pinzanes), about 15 kilometers to the northwest of San Miguel Ixtapan, found inside a looted mound and reburied by the INAH (Mexican National Institute of Anthropology and History).

A comparison of the known monument types from San Miguel Ixtapan. (Author provided)

In addition to these 14 slabs that are known with certainty from the area of San Miguel Ixtapan, 5 more are known from eyewitness accounts and personal communications:

  • Two more slabs near the Hacienda de Guadalupe (reported by Wicke and Bullington based on eyewitness accounts but already lost at the time of their visit).
  • One undecorated slab in San Francisco Tejupilco (Victor Osorio Ogarrio – personal communication), probably still in situ .
  • One slab excavated by treasure hunters from a looted mound near the entrance arch to the town of san Miguel Ixtapan, now lost.
  • One slab laying in the riverbed of the Rio Aquiagua, downstream from Rancho “I” (Victor Osorio Ogarrio – personal communication).

The size of the slabs ranges between 1.2 meters (4 ft) long by 0.9 meters (3 ft) wide, up to 1.8 meters (6 ft) by 1.6 (5 ft) wide, with a thickness of between 20 and 60 centimeters (7.9 to 23.6 in). The largest slab from Rancho “I” is believed to weight between 3 and 5 tons.

The decoration consists of an inverted T-shape above a rectangular frame with a double, triple, and in some cases even quadruple molding around it. It is not known whether the slabs were meant to be displayed horizontally or vertically, nor whether the T-shape formed the bottom or top of the slab. The assumption that the T-shape was inverted is based exclusively on the fact that most of the known slabs have been found with the inverted T-shape at the top and the rectangular frame at the bottom. The slabs in the Recinto de las Esculturas do not conform to this pattern and appear to have been placed there in secondary use.

The slab found standing in front of the church of San Miguel Ixtapan is unique in that it contains two marked protrusions in the bottom part of the inverted T-shape.

One of the wonderfully carved stone slabs found in front of the church of San Miguel Ixtapan. Unlike the other slabs, this one has two “knobs” protruding from the arms of the letter ‘T’. (Author provided)

One of the wonderfully carved stone slabs found in front of the church of San Miguel Ixtapan. Unlike the other slabs, this one has two “knobs” protruding from the arms of the letter ‘T’. (Author provided)

Cave Symbolism and the Mysterious Cerro de la Muñeca

What could be the meaning of the inverted T-shape that features so prominently in the sculptural tradition of San Miguel Ixtapan? If we leave aside interpretations based on the ‘ Ik’ Maya glyph, taken as a symbol of Wind and thus of the god Quetzalcoatl, the most convincing explanation is that the inverted T-shape may signify a cave, possibly an artificial cavern or tomb.

An almost identical symbol appears on the Map of Cuauhtinchan II as a representation of the sacred cave and place of origin. In this respect, it differs from other depictions of natural caves in that it exhibits s a geometric profile (possibly an artificial opening surmounted by a lintel), and may thus refer either to an artificial cave, or to a modified natural cavern (Medina and Tucker, 2008). 

This cave symbolism is certainly very ancient, for it is found already in Olmec art dating to the formative and Pre-Classic period, most notably at Chalcatzingo, in the Mexican state of Morelos. Among Mesoamerican peoples, the cave was seen as the physical representation of Chicomoztoc, the legendary place of origin. It may have also had a funerary association, for mortuary bundles were usually deposited in caves and are frequently depicted in codices in the interior or near the mouth of caves. The inverted T-shape may thus represent a symbolic entrance to the underworld, the dwelling of the ancestors.

One such artificially enhanced cave may have existed in the Cerro de la Muñeca, a prominent relief to the north of San Miguel Ixtapan in whose direction many of the ceremonial pyramids and platforms at the site appear to have been aligned.

Evidence of Trans-Oceanic Contact with South America?

The style of stonework found at San Miguel Ixtapan is extremely precise, with clear-cut right angles and perfectly planar surfaces. Beyond their great similarity with Peruvian stonework (like at Ñaupa Iglesia and Baño de la Ñusta in Ollantaytambo), as already remarked by Wicke and Bullington, the monolithic slabs, andesitic pillars and other basalt and andesite architectural elements of San Miguel Ixtapan evoke images of the great archaeological sites of Tiwanaku and Puma Punku in Bolivia.

There is presently no explanation for how exactly this style of megalithic stonework, which is unparalleled in Mesoamerica, could have made its way from the highlands of Peru and Bolivia to central Mexico, over 5,000 kilometers (3,107 mi) away.

Like a buried Tiwanaku still awaiting proper archaeological discovery and recognition, only future excavations under the thick alluvial silt that covers much of the site may one day reveal the true extent of the megalithic architecture of San Miguel Ixtapan. Preliminary measurements show that the ancient site must have been extensive, occupying an area of at least 3 by 1.5 kilometers (1.86 to 0.93 mi), and was possibly destroyed in a natural cataclysm (an earthquake or a landslide?) that left most of the structures deeply buried under a thick layer of sediments.

According to colonial sources, the area of San Miguel Ixtapan was inhabited by peoples speaking a non-Nahua language, called Chontal by the Aztecs, meaning “strangers” or “foreigners”. Among these peoples were certainly the Tarascans, also known as Purupecha, a people whose exact geographical origin has long intrigued historians and ethnologists.

The latest research suggests that the Tarascan may have reached the coast of Mexico from either Ecuador or Peru. Such would be proven by the existence of close trade links in Pre-Columbian times between the west of Mexico and South America, as well as by the great linguistic affinity that exists between the Quechua and Purupecha languages, together with the diffusion in this part of Mexico of typically South American metallurgical techniques. Up until colonial times, the Tarascans were known as skilled workers of gold, silver and copper, who possessed weapons and tools of metal unlike any others in Mesoamerica.

The huge carved basalt slab found broken into three pieces at the newly discovered site of Rancho “I”. It is much thicker than the slabs at the church and made of basalt instead of andesite, yet the carving is similar. If complete, it would have measured 1.8 by 1.6 meters, with a thickness of 0.5 meters and a weight of 4-5 tons. Next to it is possible to see the excavation made by looters to remove the slab from its original site, together with numerous other pieces of wrought and unwrought basalt. (Author provided)

The huge carved basalt slab found broken into three pieces at the newly discovered site of Rancho “I”. It is much thicker than the slabs at the church and made of basalt instead of andesite, yet the carving is similar. If complete, it would have measured 1.8 by 1.6 meters, with a thickness of 0.5 meters and a weight of 4-5 tons. Next to it is possible to see the excavation made by looters to remove the slab from its original site, together with numerous other pieces of wrought and unwrought basalt. (Author provided)

An artist’s reconstruction of the same stone slab from Rancho “I”, with its three recomposed fragments. (Author provided)

An artist’s reconstruction of the same stone slab from Rancho “I”, with its three recomposed fragments. (Author provided)

Endangered Archaeology at San Miguel Ixtapan

The site of San Miguel Ixtapan and its extensive megalithic remains are now threatened by urbanization and looting. One of the largest megalithic stone slabs photographed by Wicke and Bullington in 1960 on the grounds of the Hacienda de Guadalupe was broken as recently as the early 2000s by vandals and treasure hunters. Many more slabs have since disappeared and are only known through eyewitness accounts.

The whole region comprising the southern part of the state of Mexico and the north of Guerrero is a hotspot of drug trafficking and criminal activity, which also extends to antiquities trafficking and the looting of archaeological sites. Nearly everywhere one finds traces of holes and trenches dug by treasure hunters, who systematically demolish the ancient monuments in their search for valuable artifacts that they can sell on the antiquities market.

A non-profit cultural association, the ARX Project , is now involved in the documentation of the surviving megalithic monuments of the region, supporting the safe removal of the most endangered artifacts to the local museum of San Miguel Ixtapan, where they can be studied, preserved and displayed to the public.

If you wish to contribute to the conservation of this unique and exceptional site, you can donate at Donadora.org. Your donation will be key to ensuring that this important piece of our history is preserved for the benefit of future generations, as well as to support further research and exploration in one of the least studied and most endangered areas of Mesoamerica.

Top image: A photo composition of the nearly 14 known megalithic stone slabs from the site of San Miguel Ixtapan.  Source: Marco M. Vigato

By Marco M. Vigato

References

De la Fuente, J. M. 1910. Hidalgo Intimo . Ciudad de México: Tipografía Económica, pp. 17-44.

INAH. January 9, 2008. “Zona Arqueológica de San Miguel Ixtapan” in INAH. Available at: https://www.inah.gob.mx/zonas/46-zona-arqueologica-de-san-miguel-ixtapan

Malmstrom, V. H. January 1995. “Geographical Origins of the Tarascans” in Geographical Review , vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 31-40.

Medina Jaén, M. and Tucker, T. M. 2008. “El Glifo escalonado en el Mapa de Cuauhtinchan II: Símbolo de la Montaña y la Cueva de Origen” in Mapa de Cuauhtinchan II: Entre la Ciencia y lo Sagrado . Mesoamerican Research Foundation.

Mena, Ramón. “Piezas arqueológicas de Tejupilco”. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geografía y Estadística . Época 5, vol. 3, 1908, pp. 185-87.

Osorio Ogarrio, V. Á. and De León Cortés, M. A. July-August 2019. “Una posible Diosa Prehispánica en San Miguel Ixtapan, Tejupilco” in Arqueología Mexicana , 158, pp. 46-51.

Reyna Robles, R. M. 2006. La Cultura Arqueológica Mezcala . Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

Reyna Robles, R. M. and Neiderberger Betton, C. 2002. El Pasado Arqueológico de Guerrero . INAH/ CEMCA / Gobierno del Estado de Guerrero.

Rivero, J. H. 1994. Arqueología de la Frontera Tarasco-Méxica . Tesis de Licenciadura. INAH/ SEP: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

Sinaí Gomez, R. Septiembre 2010. “Historia Cronológica del Municipio de Tejupilco – Antecedentes Históricos”. Municipio de Tejupilco. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120327194635/ https://www.tejupilco.gob.mx/contenido/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=59&Itemid=59

Various Authors. June 2010. “San Miguel Ixtapan, Estado de México” in Arqueología Mexicana , Especial 35, Estado de México.

Various Authors. 1999. “Revista cultural San Miguel Ixtapan” in Expresión Antropológica , no. 1-2 Nueva Serie. Gobierno del Estado de México: Secretaría de Cultura.

Weitlaner, R. J. 1944. Informe sobre varios viajes a los estados de México y Guerrero . Ms. Carpeta XIV-2. Fondo Weitlaner, DEAS-Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Ciudad de México.

Wicke, C. R. and Bullington, M. “A possible Andean Influence in Central Mexico”. American Antiquity , vol. 25, n. 4 (April 1960), pp. 603-605.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: