In the academic study of the ancient world, chronology or timeline is of the utmost importance. This is especially true for the ancient Middle East. W
In the academic study of the ancient world, chronology or timeline is of the utmost importance. This is especially true for the ancient Middle East. When events in Egypt are to be correlated with events in Mesopotamia, the single most important factor is the selection of the right chronology among all the possibilities, for if this chronology is the wrong one, the subsequent historical review of the ancient Middle East will be skewed. Confusing chronologies is still one of the biggest problems plaguing ancient Middle Eastern studies. After centuries of archaeological endeavours in the Middle East there is still no consensus about the dating of the early Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations—both in absolute terms as well as in relation to each other—especially for the third and early second millennium BC.
Obverse of tablet A of Mesopotamian Chronicle of Early Kings ( Public Domain )
In a paper published in the Journal for Semitic Studies (2019/2), the current author proposed a new chronology for the ancient Middle East and with it a totally new picture of history emerged insofar as relations between Egypt and Mesopotamia are concerned. What made this publication so significant is that a new cuneiform text of the royal epic of the Sealand king, Gulkišar, recently discovered in the Hilprecht collection in Jena, Germany (of which the first English translation appeared in 2019), strongly supports the said chronology. This confirmation of the chronological model was published as a research note in the same journal, the Journal for Semitic Studies , in the very next issue (2020/1). It does not often happen that a theoretical model receives strong and explicit support from new discoveries.
The new understanding of history which has become available with this new chronological model reveals and unveils the identities of figures and information about related events, which have until recently remained hidden for the simple reason that this information had basically been ‘encrypted’ without the correct chronological reconstruction of history having been available. It gives good reason to believe that the great Akkadian Emperors of old visited Egypt on their western military campaigns and left certain traces there which can now be understood according to the new chronology.
Ancient Middle Eastern Chronologies
In general, there are basically only a few well-established chronologies used in the historical study of Egypt and Mesopotamia. These are compiled using certain astronomical data together with available king lists, which are adapted in accordance with the scholarly understanding of those periods in history.
For the price of a cup of coffee, you get this and all the other great benefits at Ancient Origins Premium. And – each time you support AO Premium, you support independent thought and writing.
Dr Willem McLoud is an independent South African scholar whose main interests are ancient Middle Eastern studies, Kantian philosophy and philosophy of science. Willem’s main areas of study regarding the ancient Middle East are the Sumerian, Akkadian and early Egyptian civilizations, with special focus on the Uruk and Akkadian Periods in Mesopotamian history as well as the Old Kingdom Period in Egyptian history.